找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 711|回复: 3

[讨论] 两个问题?????

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-8-31 15:23:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
有两个问题,没解的开:
1.手机的TDD干扰,到底是217HZ干扰还是217HZ上负载的高频干扰到音频了?
2.手机天线的隔离度是怎么计算出来的,如双GSM手机,接受灵敏度-110DBM,发射最大功率30DBM,两天线之间的隔离度为什么只要15左右就ok了?
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-3 14:38:48 | 显示全部楼层
没人解答啊。。。。。
自己顶个吧
点评回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-9-5 06:27:50 | 显示全部楼层
Not sure about the first question:
2) keep in mind that the TX/RX frequency is not the same, so the TX of GSM1 will not affect the RX of GSM2 as long as the max input level is below the RX can take. In other words, TX-RX SAW<Pin(max)LNA. The Antenna isolation maybe part of the antenna design spec not the radio it self.
JMHO
点评回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-9-5 13:36:02 | 显示全部楼层
what 's the "TX-RX SAWJMHO" mean?

BTW: I don't think it fit for every design.

GSM1 spurious emission in RX band --> A
A = [GSM2 sensitivity] - [C/I margin] + [Coupling loss between GSM1 & GSM2]
If Coupling loss=15, then A=-110 - 9 + 15 = -102 (dBm)

In fact, if you test "spurious emission in RX band", you can't get the value under -90dBm because the noise floor of Spectrum analyzer isn't low enough.  The -102dBm is unmeasured, but it's attainable by a TX SAW.

3GPP 51.010 think "A" value should be lower than -79dBm in GSM band.
It's based on: sensitivity = -104, couple loss = 34.5 (-104 - 9 + 34.5 = -78.5)
If "A" value = -80dBm. obviously, 15dB coupling loss cant meet the requirement.

In a word, If you cant get a better "A" value, you should increase your Coupling loss to meet your requirement.
[em01]
点评回复

使用道具 举报

高级模式
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|52RD我爱研发网 ( 沪ICP备2022007804号-2 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-25 11:51 , Processed in 0.044999 second(s), 16 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表